Well... I went and saw it today and I have to admit that the critics are WRONG!!
OK... sure... Maybe Tom Hanks has gone to the Keanu Reeves School of Facial Expressions to learn how to display none at all but this was only pointed out to me afterwards as I quite enjoyed the performances of all involved.
So, who should see it and who shouldn't....
- If you are someone who is thin-skinned about your religion and you're a christian: the you should NOT see it.
- If you are someone who is a devout anti-christian who wants to see the fall of the catholic church: you're going to be disappointed.
- If you're someone who is going to pick on little things through the movie like whether someone should be written in Greek or Hebrew: wake up to yourself and realise that you're dealing with a movie that is based on a fictional book and was produced by Hollywood. Sometimes they have to dumb it down to get bums on seats. If you can keep your analytical mind on a chain: Go see it.
- If you're a typical airhead that just goes for action movies and can't maintain a philosophical discussion past "See Spot Run", go and see the next Slow & The Ridiculous (TF&TF) movie (in Tokyo yet!) - it's more your mental pace.
- If you're up for a movie that makes you think a bit and you're into conspiracy theories, then it's a good one for you.
- If you're a muslim who thinks that anyone who worships another god is someone who should die while themselves worshipping a paedophile: Go fuck yourself. Nobody cares about what you think or want. Don't laugh - maybe there'll be a movie soon about the REAL Mohammed. Get ready to burn something else you COWARDS!
As for me, I enjoyed it because I used to have a problem with christianity and religion in general in my younger days and read everything I could on the subject while often referring to the bible as a book of fairy tales. I'm still not a christian but I do believe in what I call "The 7 Commandments" (the first 3 don't apply to me) and the bible does contain some good lessons to help one through life.
I've not read Dan Brown's book but I did read 'Bloodline of the Holy Grail' by Laurence Gardner (the one in the lawsuit where Dan Brown is being sued for plagiarism). There are quite a few things that match up with what I've read over the years and at least they got it right in the movie that a pentacle does NOT go hand-in-hand with devil worship (but on the other hand, they did get it wrong in saying it was a pentacle - it was a pentagram. It only becomes a pentacle when there is a circle around the 5-pointed star.)
If you have a little bit of knowledge and you're not afraid to suspend reality for a while - go see it. At worst, checking out the French bird in it has it's own redeeming features :)
Every once in a while, I have something to say yet am denied this right by the media and everyone else who disagrees with me.
If you can't handle opposing ideas: grow up!
Remember: The Greatest Crime is not to teach children to think the same, but to reject those who think differently!
Friday, May 19, 2006
End Protective Custody NOW
The next thing that should go is the use of protective custody for rock-spiders like this sack of shit and other assorted dirtbags.
Why should MY taxes (and yours too) be used to protect scum who prey on children or suggest that the women in this country are trash and are only there to be raped and beaten?
Put them in general population - and if they happen to have the same treatment inflicted on them as was inflicted on their victims, maybe they'll comprehend that what they did was wrong. And if they die - who cares! Good riddance to bad company.
If you happen to be one of these do-gooders who think that 'people' like this have rights then let's see if you're as forgiving if it's YOUR 6-year-old daughter that is fiddled with by some paedophile (named Mohammed?) or raped repeatedly when she's 15 by a gang who describe her as "trash".
If you still think they have 'rights', I say that you'd be the sort of person that shirks responsibility and would gladly leave it up to someone else to help the girl pick up what's left of her life and to battle through the emotional scars.
Cowards protecting cowards.
postscript: as for the pack rapist wanting a family.... sure, let him have a family but NOT at my expense. Nor is he to get any form of special medical treatment that he doesn't pay for UP FRONT while people are on extensive waiting lists in hospitals all around the country. If he makes it out of jail with his nutsack still attached and there is a woman STUPID enough to take his seed: good luck to him. I'd prefer to see his cock and balls nailed to a wooden chair while he sits there and watches.
Why should MY taxes (and yours too) be used to protect scum who prey on children or suggest that the women in this country are trash and are only there to be raped and beaten?
Put them in general population - and if they happen to have the same treatment inflicted on them as was inflicted on their victims, maybe they'll comprehend that what they did was wrong. And if they die - who cares! Good riddance to bad company.
If you happen to be one of these do-gooders who think that 'people' like this have rights then let's see if you're as forgiving if it's YOUR 6-year-old daughter that is fiddled with by some paedophile (named Mohammed?) or raped repeatedly when she's 15 by a gang who describe her as "trash".
If you still think they have 'rights', I say that you'd be the sort of person that shirks responsibility and would gladly leave it up to someone else to help the girl pick up what's left of her life and to battle through the emotional scars.
Cowards protecting cowards.
postscript: as for the pack rapist wanting a family.... sure, let him have a family but NOT at my expense. Nor is he to get any form of special medical treatment that he doesn't pay for UP FRONT while people are on extensive waiting lists in hospitals all around the country. If he makes it out of jail with his nutsack still attached and there is a woman STUPID enough to take his seed: good luck to him. I'd prefer to see his cock and balls nailed to a wooden chair while he sits there and watches.
Manslaughter vs Murder
Yet again the legal system in Australia has let the people down. I say "legal" system because there sure-as-shit ISN'T a system of "justice" in this country - unless you happen to be in a political party that frightens the bejeezus out of QR Premier, Petie Beater. You'll be locked up on trumped up charges if you're a political threat or fail to pay $100 in taxes!
When the hell is the law going to be passed that if you kill someone unintentionally (manslaughter) while committing a crime then the mandatory sentence and crime is then escalated to MURDER?
Sure - the namby-pamby arsewipes that constitute themselves as Defense Lawyers will argue all sorts of crap to put reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury but this bullshit should be stricken from any court record.
What needs to be determined is if the initial crime (in this case: bag-snatching). If the crime was committed and the person has died: no trial for that - the penalty stands.
The legal system in Australia, the judges, the defense lawyers, the wannabe social workers that protect criminal "rights" - they all need a good arse-raping with a wire brush dipped in paint thinners. That might wake the dickheads up a bit!
How about we protect the VICTIMS of crime for once? Not the criminals!
When the hell is the law going to be passed that if you kill someone unintentionally (manslaughter) while committing a crime then the mandatory sentence and crime is then escalated to MURDER?
Sure - the namby-pamby arsewipes that constitute themselves as Defense Lawyers will argue all sorts of crap to put reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury but this bullshit should be stricken from any court record.
What needs to be determined is if the initial crime (in this case: bag-snatching). If the crime was committed and the person has died: no trial for that - the penalty stands.
The legal system in Australia, the judges, the defense lawyers, the wannabe social workers that protect criminal "rights" - they all need a good arse-raping with a wire brush dipped in paint thinners. That might wake the dickheads up a bit!
How about we protect the VICTIMS of crime for once? Not the criminals!
Warne vs Hunt
I found myself thinking (stop laughing!) when reading this about the affairs of Rex Hunt and reflecting on the bits I have seen in the media about it.
Of course, when a celebrity has an affair, it still ranks way up there on the give-a-shit scale that I have. I think this is hovering somewhere around what colour socks I plan to wear on August 19, 2040 (if I'm still alive).
I recall that in the past I have given Shane Warne a verbal slagging because of his behaviour when he couldn't keep his dick in his trousers yet I can't seem to do the same for Rex Hunt?
I don't understand what makes Rex Hunt more likeable than Shane Warne in my mind considering that I have never met nor know either of them.
Of course, when a celebrity has an affair, it still ranks way up there on the give-a-shit scale that I have. I think this is hovering somewhere around what colour socks I plan to wear on August 19, 2040 (if I'm still alive).
I recall that in the past I have given Shane Warne a verbal slagging because of his behaviour when he couldn't keep his dick in his trousers yet I can't seem to do the same for Rex Hunt?
I don't understand what makes Rex Hunt more likeable than Shane Warne in my mind considering that I have never met nor know either of them.
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
Gun violence kills '1000 every day'
GUN violence is a global epidemic that kills an estimated 1000 people a day and stronger international controls on the sale and movement of arms are needed, a report released today said.
"If 1000 people a day were dying of avian flu, the world would sit up and take notice," said the report, published by IANSA, a group of agencies including Amnesty International and Oxfam.
Well then... thanks for the news about this revelation.
If 1000 people a day were dying of avian flu... - thank you for that comparison Amnesty & Oxfam - you've justified my reason for not giving either of you any donations. The original reason is because the money mostly leaves this country and doesn't help those in need here. Charity begins at home, remember?
OK - OK - I don't give either of you any money because I just don't give a shit.
More importantly, these two organisations are complaining about guns and people killing people with guns. Thank you SO much for the assumption I had to make that this was around the entire planet.
Have any of the boneheads in either of these "charities" thought about how many people die each day, around the globe, on the public road systems? It's more than 1,000 people I can tell you!
Which deaths are more easily prevented?
One set of deaths are the result of crime (obviously). Various police forces around the planet either don't have the resources to tackle the crime problem or are bought off (in 3rd world countries) to look the other way. The other people are dying because they are trying to commute in one form or another and are being killed because road rules aren't being enforced and people are not being taught how to drive.
So.... yet another DICKHEAD in the media wants to push their personal agenda about how guns are bad but are quite happy for everyone to be armed with another form of weapon: the licence that 99% of the population seemingly gets out of a Corn Flakes packet!
Thursday, May 11, 2006
Me confused again....
Can anyone answer this question for me?
Here was have a methamphetamine drug lab in a high rise unit in Sufferer's Parasite (Surfer's Paradise) on the Gold Coast (
Man, woman charged over drug lab) which was initially reported in the media as having "blown up" (ie: explosive-like).
Next we have a bloke in Brisbane who has made a bomb for whatever purpose (I can only *dream* that it was intended for the Big Brother house)(Bail refused for explosives accused).
Why then is the latter rushed before court and charged and held and is the focus of many media releases while the morons in the former are not?
It is not known for sure that the latter was a terrorist or what his intentions are - but we sure-as-hell know what the former were up to!
Is there a single suburb in any major city in Australia at all that doesn't have a meth lab in it? How do these people differ from other "terrorists"?
Here was have a methamphetamine drug lab in a high rise unit in Sufferer's Parasite (Surfer's Paradise) on the Gold Coast (
Man, woman charged over drug lab) which was initially reported in the media as having "blown up" (ie: explosive-like).
Next we have a bloke in Brisbane who has made a bomb for whatever purpose (I can only *dream* that it was intended for the Big Brother house)(Bail refused for explosives accused).
Why then is the latter rushed before court and charged and held and is the focus of many media releases while the morons in the former are not?
It is not known for sure that the latter was a terrorist or what his intentions are - but we sure-as-hell know what the former were up to!
Is there a single suburb in any major city in Australia at all that doesn't have a meth lab in it? How do these people differ from other "terrorists"?
Friday, May 05, 2006
Look Eddie, just PISS OFF!!
Who the hell cares if Eddie Maguire now runs channel 9 or is president of a cross-country basketball club or even if he can suck a golf ball up through a garden hose - just piss off already! You're getting your CEO-(aka: Useless Prat than runs a company into the ground)-paycheck and you don't have to work anymore, so just disappear willya?
Now he wants to get involved in the coverage debacle that is Channel 9 down in Beaconsfield in Tasmania with the trapped miners. Your mate, Mike Munroe, should write for Woman's Day considering his PATHETIC journalistic standards and idiotic questions. One more clown from "The News Leader" shouldn't make that much of a difference.
When are the media intelligentsia in this country going to work out a question to ask that is not stupendously ridiculous?
Mike Munroe: Who do you feel to know that your son has been found alive?
Parents: Well, gee... dunno... we did have a good insurance policy out on him....
(DICKHEAD!!!!)
[Eddie: Who Wants To Be A Millionaire might have been a good show if it wasn't for the endless adverts and indecision and the inability of every friggin Channel 9 Program Manager to understand what a watch or a program schedule is there for. I used to tape it and watch the entire show in under 15 minutes but then stopped doing this as well so that your advertisers were not getting seen at all.]
Now he wants to get involved in the coverage debacle that is Channel 9 down in Beaconsfield in Tasmania with the trapped miners. Your mate, Mike Munroe, should write for Woman's Day considering his PATHETIC journalistic standards and idiotic questions. One more clown from "The News Leader" shouldn't make that much of a difference.
When are the media intelligentsia in this country going to work out a question to ask that is not stupendously ridiculous?
Mike Munroe: Who do you feel to know that your son has been found alive?
Parents: Well, gee... dunno... we did have a good insurance policy out on him....
(DICKHEAD!!!!)
[Eddie: Who Wants To Be A Millionaire might have been a good show if it wasn't for the endless adverts and indecision and the inability of every friggin Channel 9 Program Manager to understand what a watch or a program schedule is there for. I used to tape it and watch the entire show in under 15 minutes but then stopped doing this as well so that your advertisers were not getting seen at all.]
Pell angers Muslims, environmentalists
Good one!
Can you vote for priests?
Anyone who pisses off the Paedophile-Worship cult and the dickhead greenies (excuse redundancy) deserves a medal.
Can you vote for priests?
Anyone who pisses off the Paedophile-Worship cult and the dickhead greenies (excuse redundancy) deserves a medal.
Who's Creating the Vilification?
I keep hearing about these fuckwits in Victoria making idiotic rulings (judges) and laws (politicians) so that the Followers of the Sect-of-the-Paedophile can retain the right to feel comfortable at all times. Yet, here they are going to special lengths to grant special consideration to criminals while law-abiding people can basically "Go fuck yourselves!"
I am in Europe in 2004 - as a visitor, not as someone wanting to promote terror or death or a dhimmi-like existence - yet when I get notice that my brother has 24-to-48 hours to live, QANTAS couldn't give a shit and say that the soonest they can get me out is 7 days later.
Here is someone who IS A CRIMINAL and is in jail for a reason, and he's being given a charter flight so see his brother who is dying. WHO THE FUCK CARES if this lowlife sack of shit doesn't see his brother before he dies?? He wasn't in prison because he exceeded his water allocation while washing his car! He wasn't there because he sang 'Tiptoe Through The Tulips' an octave or two lower than Tiny Tim!
So why does some DICKHEAD in a robe think there are 'special circumstances' to let this fleabag out of prison? SO WHAT!!! Maybe next time he won't preach death and mayhem and get thrown in prison in the first place!
So now, another member of the international forum for NAMBLA gets to feel good about himself but everyone else gets told to "piss off".
Where is the Family Court bomber when you need him - a few of these judges need a wake-up call.
I am in Europe in 2004 - as a visitor, not as someone wanting to promote terror or death or a dhimmi-like existence - yet when I get notice that my brother has 24-to-48 hours to live, QANTAS couldn't give a shit and say that the soonest they can get me out is 7 days later.
Here is someone who IS A CRIMINAL and is in jail for a reason, and he's being given a charter flight so see his brother who is dying. WHO THE FUCK CARES if this lowlife sack of shit doesn't see his brother before he dies?? He wasn't in prison because he exceeded his water allocation while washing his car! He wasn't there because he sang 'Tiptoe Through The Tulips' an octave or two lower than Tiny Tim!
So why does some DICKHEAD in a robe think there are 'special circumstances' to let this fleabag out of prison? SO WHAT!!! Maybe next time he won't preach death and mayhem and get thrown in prison in the first place!
So now, another member of the international forum for NAMBLA gets to feel good about himself but everyone else gets told to "piss off".
Where is the Family Court bomber when you need him - a few of these judges need a wake-up call.
Sorry
Sorry to all who look back every once in a while - I've been slack and lazy and finding it a bit hard to type considering that my left hand is still in a cast (you can't write the shit I do without having at least one hand free to..... *ahem* :)
Posts will be coming soon - lots to grumble about....
Posts will be coming soon - lots to grumble about....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)